Re: hashed-storage vs. mmap

[twb@cybersource.com.au (Trent W. Buck)]

Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> writes:

> We have some options now:
>
>  a) Upload mmap-0.4.1 again, using an epoch bump.
>  b) Introduce an haskell-mmap4 source package and libghc6-mmap4-* binary
>     packages until hashed-storage uses 0.5.4
>  c) Backport the mmap-0.5-compatibility patch from the hashed-storage
>     0.4 series and apply that locally.

Darcs 2.4 appears to be broken with mmap 0.5 (i.e. option c), see

    http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1753
    http://bugs.darcs.net/patch169

Therefore I think we need (a) or (b).