Re: ghc6 6.12.1-6 in experimental; next one to unstable?
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 14:31:41 -0200 2010:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 12:02 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 07:28:50 -0200 2010:
> > (...)
> > > While we are at it: Should we remove haddock, hscolour etc. from the
> > > library build dependencies, and make them a dependency of
> > > haskell-devscripts?
> > I think it's a good idea. Maybe we should do the same with debhelper, cdbs
> > and ghc6-* too?
> Not cdbs, because debian/rules explicitly calls files from cdbs. cdbs
> actually depends on debhelper...
So should we remove debhelper from Build-Depends or leave it for clarity?