Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 7 Jul 2009, at 01:06, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Last advantage is I see is that it’ll be easier to have something like
pet.cgi which will have a way of knowing what packages are waiting
Yes if we work this way it's quite reasonable. It's been my experience
that a PET instance was not regularly scanned for needs-sponsorship
packages but so long as the DDs here do check regularly then it will
help us reduce noise. I'm fine to go with your proposal.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.