On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:34:44AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I???m wondering if there is a smart way to prevent that in the future, The almost sole scenario where repackaging the upstream tarball is necessary is licensing troubles and I hope that we won't be seeing more of that in the future. I don't think that we need to start planning for that as a regular feature. This was a rather exceptional situation. > i.e. starting with ghc-6.10.1 Is using ghc6 (<< 6.8.2+) considered a > clean solution, or is it still a hack? It's still fine as far as I'm concerned.
Description: Digital signature