Re: FBVNC

To: debian-handheld@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FBVNC
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:37:33 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031125223733.GP9377@dijkstra.csh.rit.edu>
Mail-followup-to: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>, debian-handheld@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E2F193BC-1F77-11D8-A1C4-000393CE2AEA@riskmetrics.com>
References: <[🔎] E2F193BC-1F77-11D8-A1C4-000393CE2AEA@riskmetrics.com>

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:47:57PM -0500, Alexander Vingardt wrote:

> Is running vncserver and fbvnc more efficient than running just tinyx 
> in terms of memory consumption and speed?

I haven't done any benchmarking, but it seems highly probable than tinyx
would perform much better.

> Does tinyx support the full res 640x480 on C7XX?

I don't know; I don't have one.

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FBVNC
  - From: Major A <andras@users.sourceforge.net>

References:
- FBVNC
  - From: Alexander Vingardt <alex.vingardt@riskmetrics.com>

Prev by Date: FBVNC
Next by Date: Re: FBVNC
Previous by thread: FBVNC
Next by thread: Re: FBVNC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread