On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 13:25 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Is there any hope of having the gconf local lock patch added to gconf? > > The new gnucash will require the patch, which Havoc Pennington has > > previously said is good. It is necessary to maintain compatibility > > between gconfd-2 and libgconf11. I say we get this patch into gconf1 asap, as it makes gconf1 and gconf2 use the same backends. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com jabber: ross@burtonini.com www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part