Re: gnome 2.6 upgrade report (bad news)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > This package is based on a tarball from art.gnome.org (temporarily down)
> > and is certainly not going to change.
>
> No need to change it, you just have to rebuild it against GTK+ 2.4.
Just to make myself clear: I don't mean that I don't want to change the
package, I am just clarifying that the upstream evolution of this package
is more or less stall.
Do you mean that if rebuilt against gtk+ 2.4, it will be ok for both
gnome 2.4 and 2.6?
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In
practice there is. -- Yogi Berra
Reply to: