Re: gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6
Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org> writes:
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 01:43:56 -0500,
>>>>>> "JM" == John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org> wrote:
>
> JM> Why keep it in experimental? packages in testing exist with newer
> JM> versions in unstable. I don't see why we should hold back the gnome
> JM> version in unstable until testing is released as stable.
>
> Because sid isn't used as intended purpose anymore.
>
> I would ask you. why do you need gtk+ 2.4 and GNOME 2.6 so
> much in the unstable? do you have any objection except "I
> just want to play it. but it's hard time to me to install it
> from experimental."
Stop with that. GTK 2.4 and GNOME 2.6 are *stable* and not experimental
release, and we need to package those releases in unstable.
Christian
Reply to: