Re: Accepted libgnomeprint 2.6.2-1 (i386 source all)

[Rob Taylor <robtaylor@fastmail.fm>]

A freeze sounds good to me. Sorry about this, I had a bit of misunderstanding on the state of play.

Rob

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 06:46:25 -0500
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:32:19PM -0400, Rob Taylor wrote:
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:43:58 -0300
> > Source: libgnomeprint
> > Binary: libgnomeprint2.2-0 libgnomeprint2.2-doc libgnomeprint2.2-data libgnomeprint2.2-dev
> > Architecture: source all i386
> > Version: 2.6.2-1
> > Distribution: unstable
> > Urgency: medium
> > Maintainer: Rob Taylor <robtaylor@fastmail.fm>
> > Changed-By: Rob Taylor <robtaylor@fastmail.fm>
> > Description: 
> >  libgnomeprint2.2-0 - The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - runtime files
> >  libgnomeprint2.2-data - The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - data files
> >  libgnomeprint2.2-dev - The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - development files
> >  libgnomeprint2.2-doc - The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - documentation files
> > Changes: 
> >  libgnomeprint (2.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >    * upgrade to new upstream
> >    * Fixed debian/watch to use pasv
> 
> Could we please have a mini-freeze of everything depending on cupsys? We
> need to get this all into testing quite soon.
> 
> (Sorry for picking on this upload, it's just one that was brought up on
> IRC and seems fairly central.)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>