Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Em 04 Nov 2002 19:53:18 -0500, Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:31, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> > I thought everyone had agreed on moving GNOME2 to unstable and removing
> > the 2 suffix, while I was updating my backport, though, I was surprised
> > to see nautilus 1.0.6 was downloaded by my 'apt-get source' command.
>
> Already filed as #166074.
ok... I didn't check the bug list, thought there was a reason for
keeping the old name for nautilus
[]s!
- --
kov@debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>
Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9x0w+t1anjIgqbEsRAuj6AJ49ZfawvHGI7ym2TxZFb1LBLi6tfACgi++V
riRNyQy3tH/jUOs4kVlYwgk=
=b/D+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: