Re: Gedit2 and some more packages.

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gedit2 and some more packages.
From: Michael Toomim <toomim@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 01:31:36 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 3D3FB768.7070206@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20020719085247.46eb6b43.julien@portalier.com> <[🔎] 20020719081005.GB1408@tatonka.pfalz.de> <[🔎] 3D3F491D.0@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

Michael Toomim wrote:

I think it should NOT be option c), because then users are very likelynot to download it at all. I didn't realize that there WAS agnome-utils2 available, because experimental won't download itautomatically and it isn't automatically pulled in from any depends inother gnome2 packages... and I don't think even apt-cache search gnome2will find it. Furthermore, it sounds like Julien just had the sameproblem -- he didn't realize a gnome-utils2 existed.


Sorry, by gnome-utils2 I meant gnome-utils version 2.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Gedit2 and some more packages.
  - From: Julien Portalier <julien@portalier.com>
- Re: Gedit2 and some more packages.
  - From: Jochen Voss <jvoss2@web.de>
- Re: Gedit2 and some more packages.
  - From: Michael Toomim <toomim@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Moving Gnome2 repository
Next by Date: Nautilus2 from gnome2/woody reposiroty crash
Previous by thread: Re: Gedit2 and some more packages.
Next by thread: libpng vulnerability, why does gnome2 depend on libpng2 and not libpng3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread