On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 08:58, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 02:48, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > No, if it's generated by configure, and necessary to build, it should be > > removed by a make distclean. Just like make clean shouldn't remove > > Makefiles. > > Hmmm. The Makefiles generated by configure are kind of a special case, > because you need them to run Makefile targets like 'distclean' :) and intltool is needed to run "make". Otherwise "make clean ; make" would fail, and it's supposed to work. > I guess it's debatable whether the intltool stuff should be removed by > upstream's 'clean' target or by their 'distclean' target. Regardless, > it does appear that it should definitely be removed by the debian/rules > clean target. Yes, although, the intltool files being removed by the clean target is very not debatable. <snipped configure stuff that I'm probably wrong about> -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part