--- Begin Message ---
Package: locales
Version: 2.5-11
Severity: normal
Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Is Debian in a naming-scheme transition from "libc6" to "glibc"?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.2rlj
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 [glibc-2.5-1] 2.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
locales recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: None
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 15:46 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.5-11
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
>
> Is Debian in a naming-scheme transition from "libc6" to "glibc"?
No. glibc uses virtual package names (via the use of Provides) to allow
packages to indicate that they require a particular interface version
rather than a specific package version. Other packages, for instance
apt, do similar.
If this were a transition, it would be a rather slow one :-)
adam@kaa:~$ apt-cache show locales | egrep "^(Version|Depends)"
Version: 2.6-1
Depends: glibc-2.6-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Version: 2.6-0exp3
Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Version: 2.5-11
Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Version: 2.5-9
Depends: glibc-2.5-1, debconf | debconf-2.0
Version: 2.2.5-11.8
Depends: glibc-2.2.5-11.8, debconf (>= 0.2.26)
I'm closing this report as nothing in it appears to be a bug.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---