>Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 16:17 schrieb Wolfgang Wieser:
>> So... am I doing something wrong or is this still not fixed?
>> Also, the info-documentation of libc/initstate_r() needs fixing.
>> I's just a "does the same as initstate()" blah-blah and nowhere is
>> explained how the random_data buffer should be set up in the first
>> Since, obviously, initstate_r() assumes to see some valid
>> pointer values in random_data...
>As far as I can tell was this bug closed by Phil Blundell in the last
>glibc (2.3.5-10) upload:
Thanks for pointing that out. I was using -9 and not -10 and the bug
is actually fixed.
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++