Bug#327016: Any insights on this GLIBC_PRIVATE issue ?

To: 327016@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#327016: Any insights on this GLIBC_PRIVATE issue ?
From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:45:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050924134544.GR28173@nowhere.earth>
Reply-to: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>, 327016@bugs.debian.org

Does anyone has a precise idea of the reason for such mismatches ?  It
would look like the 1st step towards getting rid of them once and for
all.

It looks like such an issue would get in the way of the possiblity to
mix-and-match packages from various sources, which would indeed be bad
news...

Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#327016: Any insights on this GLIBC_PRIVATE issue ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#329108: gcc-4.0 FTBFS on, uh, i386
Next by Date: Re: FTBFS due to dynamic variable `_SDA_BASE_@@WXU_2.6' is zero size
Previous by thread: Bug#329785: marked as done (libc6: dirname() fails with sig11 on amd64 (x86_64))
Next by thread: Bug#327016: Any insights on this GLIBC_PRIVATE issue ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread