On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
> > problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
> > which may really cause problems here as ld.so is not effected. (See this
> > as a small part of the upgrade to 2.3.4, with the exception that you
> > don't break the compatiblity between ld.so and libc.so.6.)
> Yes, exactly, thinking about "upgrade to 2.3.4", it should not make a
> I'm rathar a bit nervous of supporting this special situation (ex:
> distro compatibility and so on) because -21 should be the last call
> for sarge stuff...
Could you explain what it is you're worried about? We absolutely
ought to have this patch...