Bug#219352: xmms libc crash
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:19, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >> I also tested on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, even with removing
> >> ~/.xmms. However I cannot reproduce it... Which CPU do you use?
I use an AMD Athlon XP 2500+ on an Asus nforce2 board with nvidia drivers.
> > I also cannot reproduce 2.4 kernel on k7 using Debian's package, and
> > Pentium 2 Xeon, using Debian's 2.6.0-test9 kernel package.
> The original bug report says "Unless libmikmod2 is installed [...]".
> (xmms recommends libmikmod2.)
> If I move /usr/lib/libmikmod.so.2* out of the way I can reproduce
> this problem with 2.6.0-test9-mm2:
Yes, if I install libmikmod2 xmms starts up normally.
> % xmms
> libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx'
> I also can reproduce the problem mentioned above:
> % /lib/ld-2.3.2.so /lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: Assertion
> `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next ==
> _rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed! % /lib/ld-2.3.2.so
> BTW, why aren't the executable bits set for libc-2.3.2.so in the
> current glibc packages?
This is new since the -ds libc packages I think. Until now I thought it is to
hide the bug ;)