[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#48370: marked as done (libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes)



Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:57:41 +0900
with message-id <80k7erld0q.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 1999 11:31:58 +0000
Received: (qmail 30044 invoked from network); 26 Oct 1999 11:31:57 -0000
Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (root@131.159.0.81)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 1999 11:31:57 -0000
Received: from hpsystem14.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([131.159.4.9] EHLO hpsystem14.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ident: root [port 2938]) by tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de with ESMTP id <111117-236>; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:31:48 +0000
Received: from schoepf.modem.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([172.16.0.164]:1076 "EHLO asterix.gallien" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE") by hpsystem14.informatik.tu-muenchen.de with ESMTP id <12109-29791>; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:31:19 +0200
Received: from schoepf by asterix.gallien with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11g4dc-0000Y9-00; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:19:36 +0200
From:	Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
Subject: libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes
To:	submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6
Message-Id: <E11g4dc-0000Y9-00@asterix.gallien>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:19:36 +0200

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.1.2-5
Severity: normal

According to the manpages for getresuid(2) and setresuid(2), these functions
should be defined by unistd.h but in fact aren't.

Thomas
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux asterix 2.2.13 #1 Wed Oct 20 20:20:14 CEST 1999 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6           2.1.2-5        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 48370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2003 13:57:43 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sat Mar 22 07:57:43 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18wjVH-0001VN-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:57:43 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
	by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8BB48C33C6; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:57:41 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:57:41 +0900
Message-ID: <80k7erld0q.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Thomas Schoepf <schoepf@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>,
	48370-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc6-dev: unistd.h doesn't contain setresgid prototypes
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 48370-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
	tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

> According to the manpages for getresuid(2) and setresuid(2), these functions
> should be defined by unistd.h but in fact aren't.

> To start off, the manpages are not part of glibc, they are maintained
> seperately. Secondly, these functions are Linux specific, and so do not
> apply to all the OS's that glibc runs on (they are not part of any
> standard, and noted in the manpage). This is the reason they are not
> declared in the headers.

glibc 2.3.1-16 have the prototype already.
I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: