Bug#166914: marked as done (glibc 2.1 binary says: __strtoul_internal not defined in file libpthread.so.0)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Mar 2003 22:55:49 +0900
with message-id <808yvr8emy.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#166914: glibc 2.1 binary says: __strtoul_internal not defined in file libpthread.so.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2002 11:41:39 +0000
>From Harri.Dunkel@synopsys.com Tue Oct 29 05:41:39 2002
Return-path: <Harri.Dunkel@synopsys.com>
Received: from kiruna.synopsys.com [204.176.20.18]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 186Ukd-0007nn-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 05:41:39 -0600
Received: from maiden.synopsys.com (maiden.synopsys.com [146.225.100.170])
by kiruna.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D0BF552
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 03:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from goofy.gr05.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by maiden.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA14450;
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 03:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Synopsys.COM (dunkel@fright [146.225.224.165])
by goofy.gr05.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21545;
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:39:00 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <3DBE7354.8070707@Synopsys.COM>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:39:00 +0100
From: Harald Dunkel <Harri.Dunkel@synopsys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021027
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: glibc 2.1 binary says: __strtoul_internal not defined in file libpthread.so.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-3
Hi folks,
I've got this error message at runtime, using glibc 2.3.1-3:
myexec: relocation error: myexec: symbol __strtoul_internal, version GLIBC_2.0 \
not defined in file libpthread.so.0 with link time reference
FATAL: Exec 'myexec' failed: status = 127
Some shared libraries used by myexec were built on RedHat 6.2.
The rest was compiled and linked on Sid using gcc 2.95.2. No
error messages at build time.
Regards
Harri
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166914-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2003 13:55:52 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Fri Mar 07 07:55:51 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18rIKE-0004ES-00; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:55:50 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 59BA7C33C6; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:55:49 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 22:55:49 +0900
Message-ID: <808yvr8emy.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Harald Dunkel <Harri.Dunkel@synopsys.com>,
166914-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug#166914: glibc 2.1 binary says: __strtoul_internal not defined in file libpthread.so.0
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 3E689747.1020504@Synopsys.COM>
References: <3DBE7354.8070707@Synopsys.COM>
<[🔎] 80el5j8jsp.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
<[🔎] 3E689747.1020504@Synopsys.COM>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 166914-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
At Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:57:43 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> The problem is ages old. In the meantime we have migrated our
> build environment from RH6.2 to 7.2, and the problem became
> irrelevant for us. From my point of view its OK to close this
> bug report.
Thanks, that's good. I close this bug.
> But there are still incompatibilities between glibc 2.2.4 of
> RH7.2 and glibc 2.3.1-14. Our major GUI (built on RH7.2) does
> a reproducable core dump when I run it on Sid. Are you interested
> in another bug report?
If you can provide information in detail, please report :)
However if it's not free software, it may be difficult to hunt
the problem...
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: