Re: libgcc-compat for arm, ia64, m68k, and s390
At Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:10:02 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:42:25AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > It's interesting that when Jakub Jelinek sent this patch,
> > but Ulrich Drepper added it as GLIBC_2.2 without tests. All
> > our patch was as GLIBC_2.0 symbols, but I follow Uli's
> > decision.
> I think there wasn't a glibc 2.0 for ia64. So this makes sense.
That's right! ...So, should s390 be GLIBC_2.1 or 2.2?
> > __clear_cache (libgcc2):
> [..snip..]
> > Only libgnostep-gui needs it. However, until we really need
> > this symbol, it should not be applied. After my build, I
> > judge it.
> Think that's a good canditate for manual testing. If the upgrade works
> everything's fine and there's no need to add the symbol. Maybe we should
> cc: the interesting parts of this discussion to the list of the involved
> ports.
OK, maybe debian-m68k?
BTW, now I've commited libgcc-compat-other, and libgcc-compat-all
(2003-03-02) for debian-glibc cvs.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: