Bug#168703: marked as done (libc6: Build-Depends on dpkg (>= 1.10.8) but testing only has 1.10.4)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:11:49 +0900
with message-id <80smu4c1iy.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#168703: libc6: Build-Depends on dpkg (>= 1.10.8) but testing only has 1.10.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2002 18:10:00 +0000
>From BelgoKing@gmx.de Mon Nov 11 12:10:00 2002
Return-path: <BelgoKing@gmx.de>
Received: from marfik.cc.upv.es (marfik.upv.es) [158.42.2.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18BJ0Y-0004qD-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:09:59 -0600
Received: from pop.upv.es (maia.cc.upv.es [158.42.4.11])
by marfik.upv.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gABIHjF02104
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:17:45 +0100
Received: from smtp2.upv.es (smtp.cc.upv.es [158.42.250.10])
by pop.upv.es (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gABI9rd19546
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:09:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: from grumete.iti.upv.es (grumete.iti.upv.es [158.42.51.251])
by smtp2.upv.es (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gABHgGX06127;
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:42:56 +0100
Received: from mailborg.iti.upv.es (mailborg [192.168.1.220])
by grumete.iti.upv.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A238ABBFD; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:42:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mobi.iti.upv.es (mobi.iti.upv.es [192.168.1.25])
by mailborg.iti.upv.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2313615EA22; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:42:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tobi by mobi.iti.upv.es with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18BISm-00072Y-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:35:04 +0100
From: Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch <BelgoKing@gmx.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: Build-Depends on dpkg (>= 1.10.8) but testing only has 1.10.4
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:35:04 +0100
Message-Id: <E18BISm-00072Y-00@mobi.iti.upv.es>
Sender: Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch <BelgoKing@gmx.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal
apt-build does not compile libc6 on my testing, because it can't get
dpkg 1.10.8 . But when I change the Build-Depends line manually, it
doesn't cause any packaging problems. So, I guess there could just be
dpkg 1.10.4 in the Build-Dependency section.
Regards,
Tobi
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mobi 2.4.19 #1 Sun Oct 27 06:35:48 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168703-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2003 08:11:51 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Mon Mar 03 02:11:51 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pl38-0006vU-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 02:11:51 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A2020C33C6; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:11:49 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:11:49 +0900
Message-ID: <80smu4c1iy.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch <BelgoKing@gmx.de>,
168703-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#168703: libc6: Build-Depends on dpkg (>= 1.10.8) but testing only has 1.10.4
In-Reply-To: <80el7v6flc.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
References: <E18BISm-00072Y-00@mobi.iti.upv.es>
<80el7v6flc.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 168703-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:55:27 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
> At Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:35:04 +0100,
> Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch wrote:
> > apt-build does not compile libc6 on my testing, because it can't get
> > dpkg 1.10.8 . But when I change the Build-Depends line manually, it
> > doesn't cause any packaging problems. So, I guess there could just be
> > dpkg 1.10.4 in the Build-Dependency section.
>
> dpkg-dev is already supplied in Build-Depends.
> I don't understand why dpkg "1.10.4" is needed.
> Could you tell me more in detail?
I don't hear appropriate reason, so I close this bug.
If you don't agree, please reopen and tell us more explanation.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: