Re: glibc 2.3.1 status
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 02:05:20PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:23:32 -0500,
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:02:55PM -0600, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > > So, it looks like the arm problem's been worked out, thanks to Phil
> > > Blundell. You've still got problems with at least:
> > > * #175511: threaded errno broken on alpha, fix in CVS
> Thanks Phil and Daniel :)
> BTW, I would like to know how to solve arm problem. Is it buildd
It was a kernel/glibc issue -- the new glibc used the ABI in a way that
used to be different and the 2.2 arm kernels had some "compatability" code
to make it work the old way, breaking the new glibc. AIUI. Fix is to remove
the compatability stuff from the 2.2 kernel and/or to move to 2.4 kernels;
which was also why the test build worked fine.
> > > * #175526: glibc 2.3 breaks gcc 3.2 tests on m68k
> > > * #175529: re_compile_pattern broken
> #175526 is now under building and checking. I was surprised that
> gcc-3.2 could not build with debian gcc-3.2 latest on m68k. Phil
> suggested me some hints (use gcc-2.95, or -O), so I'm trying its test.
> m68k is too slow to build, it's needed more time.
> I guess #175529 is related with another regex (mutt error) problem.
> Is Someone tackling this issue? I plan to contact this report to
> regex upstream author Hasegawa-san.
> Well, me too. BTW, is this weekend appropriate? Due to gcc-3.2
> transition is under going, next weekend is more suitable even if we
> fix all bugs?
There're enough real problems to worry about, without delaying for potential
problems. If it turns out more stuff needs to be done, it can be done in an