Re: new ppc libgcc-compat code in glibc-2-2-branch
At Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:02:37 -0400 (EDT),
Jack Howarth wrote:
> I was looking at your 0list patch list from the debian glibc cvs
> and noticed you had two patches disabled which I was able to get to
> apply to my locally rolled copy. These patches are...
> You might double check that those two patches aren't really
> able to apply.
Thanks, I reversed.
But I wonder the de_CH patch of both locales-stuff.dpatch and
locales-de_CH.dpatch is needed. glibc-2-2-branch and glibc 2.2.92 is
not applied these changes.
The significant change is
-d_fmt "<U0025><U0059><U002D><U0025><U006D><U002D><U0025><U0064>" %Y-%m-%d
+d_fmt "<U0025><U0064><U002E><U0025><U006D><U002E><U0025><U0059>" %d-%m-%Y
Is this needed for de_CH people?
The format '%Y-%m-%d' is defined as ISO-8601. It seems more appropriate.
Does anyone know about it?