Re: Bug#155917: ifenslave_0.07+2.5.15-1(m68k/unstable/q650): FTBFS on m68k
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:14:04PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Well please tell me which one it is, kernel-patch-2.4.14-m68k or
> kernel-headers-whatever. I noticed that kernel-headers is a virtual
> package, it is provided by kernel-header-something. I guess each buildd
> has their own kernel-header-something installed. Perhaps the q650
> machine has an old version installed?
No, as Ben said kernel-headers is pulled into libc6-dev. Anyway, I've
just noticed that there's a kernel-headers-2.4.14-m68k source package,
so that's the one to reassign this to (though I'm not sure if this is
really a bug; but I suppose we could just hack those definitions into
the header till we get 2.4.18 packages).
> Anyway, ifenslave does not depend on kernel headers, unless you
> (Michael) are saying that any program that uses symbolic names for
> ioctl() numbers depends on kernel headers...
See /usr/share/doc/libc6/README.Debian.gz (Q3). It seems like everyone
has pretty much given up on this issue though.