Re: [DebianGIS] Re: grass compilation problems
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:45:00 +0100 "Francesco P. Lovergine"
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:16:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:28 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > Why wait? Which version would you rather have included in etch?
> > > I suspect 6.0.2 is the better one, and the version we want to
> > > include in etch. If it is, immediate upload is the best option.
> > This far from the etch freeze, probably makes more sense to upload
> > right away, especially since 6.0.2 is a bug fix release. Only
> > consideration is the extra wait for testing users. Anyways, the
> > netcdf transition is probably more important to get gdal/etc in.
> The wating time is indeed for testing users, who currently have a
> completely broken version. netcdf seems finally hinted, so in brief
> we could have an almost working tool chain in etch. And that is a
> good thing to increase testing.
> > > Besides, the autobuilders failed to build grass on almost all
> > > archs, and a new upload might fix it.
> > Actually, only on a few (alpha, mips, mipsel):
> > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=grass
> > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=grass
> > The logs for the failed builds are not yet on buildd.d.o :(
> -2 failed, not -3 which is currently buildable. Also, grass is a damn
> heavy beast for autobuilders, so I would avoid to uploading too often.
Is the build based on the CVS-debian-files on alioth. If so, we would
be happy to update the current files in upstream GRASS_CVS for the
debian-build to have a propper debian-folder also inside the GRASS_CVS.
GDF Hannover - Solutions for spatial data analysis and remote sensing
Hannover Office - Mengendamm 16d - D-30177 Hannover
Internet: www.gdf-hannover.de - Email: email@example.com
Phone : ++49-(0)511.39088507 - Fax: ++49-(0)511.39088508