Re: [Pkg-grass-general] Re: Bug#264566: Any progress on grass 5.7?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I do not think 5.3 is much more stable than 5.7, anyway (or, am I wrong?), and
5.0 is definitely too old. We work with 5.7 as users, in production, without
major problems. And things should stabilize soon. In my view, the best thing
for Debian-GIS would be to get ready (solving the grass57-gdal-qgis
intricacies) for January or so, when the whole system should be ready.
At 18:24, lunedì 11 ottobre 2004, Steve Halasz has probably written:
> On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 23:24, Hamish wrote:
> > For now I think 5.7.0 is a good starting point, although it is almost
> > four months old now. In future, definitely pull from a cvs snapshot if
> > there hasn't been a new point version, the question is how often? twice
> > a year? four times a year? I guess it depends on how much work it takes
> > the maintainers to get one out.
> I feel more comfortable working from the stable releases (and 5.7 is
> already not considered the stable branch). I would hesitate to pull
> anything from CVS but security patches.
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy Tel: (+39)348-3801953
GPG key @: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html
Only free software: www.gnu.org / www.linux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----