Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle
Matthias Klose writes:
> peter green writes:
>> >Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
>> >issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
>> >to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
>> That bug is marked as "resolved invalid" with a reply "Those symbols are
>> for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++ version names? I think it is a gcc
>> bug. Please open a gcc bug instead."
>> Does anyone know if such a bug has been filed and if so where?
> the upstream gcc-4_1-branch doesn't include the ldbl changes.
So? Does that mean the bug doesn't affect GCC 4.1? In that case, I
believe Peter is correct that the bug must be resolved before GCC 4.2
can enter unstable. Do you agree?