[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#194345: [edi@gmx.de: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package]



severity 194345 important
thanks

this case is not related to original report. reverting the severity of
the report to the old severity.

The new bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12765
the severity of this report is not RC, as there is a workaround using
g++-3.2.

Eduard Bloch writes:
> Forgotten copy; the file is stored on http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/sshfs-breaks-with-g++-3.3.tgz
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> -----
> 
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:28:47 +0200
> From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
> Subject: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package
> To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
> 
> Moin Matthias!
> Matthias Klose schrieb am Wednesday, den 22. October 2003:
> 
> > Eduard Bloch writes:
> > > severity 194345 grave
> > > tag 194345 + sid
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > It became worse. The last version cannot build my lufs package because
> > > of the astronomical memory usage. Even 2GB of virtual memory isn't
> > > enough.
> > 
> > it would be nice if you could tell us the file in question, the
> > command line options, the architecture, if reducing the optimization
> > level lets the build succeed, or if g++-3.2 succeds to finish the
> > build ...
> 
> I tried different optimisation levels, Os, O1, O2, O3, it always failed.
> The memory-usage-per-time curve seems to be parabolic, it eats a normal
> amount of memory in the beginning and allocates larger and larger
> amounts later. The builds suceeds with the Testing version of gcc-3.3
> without any problems (*cough* the package could be built few weeks ago).



Reply to: