Re: GNAT 3.15p
Florian Weimer <email@example.com> writes:
> Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada
>> validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass (please correct me if I
>> am wrong). Therefore nobody packaged 3.15 yet.
> I believe that it is reasonable (even desirable) to replace 3.14p with
> My reservations are towards GNAT 5.0 technology, which is not mature
> yet (at least in the version in the FSF tree).
> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably
> current unstable...
Thanks for taking care of this.