Bug#135967: feedback wanted on #135967
Greetings, and thanks for keeping me informed.
Alas, almost all the tests, of which there are 104 in total, fail.
Clearly a compiler issue, but more than that I cannot tell from the
Thank you very much for your work on this.
Othmar Pasteka <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:15:39AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > please try to compile lapack on arm with g77-3.1 and add the results
> > to the report.
> good and bad news:
> good first: it compiles and you get .deb packages. i changed
> debian/rules in so far that i did s/g77/g77-3.1/ at the arm
> section and i also removed the OPTOPTS commentcharacter and added
> a -O0.
> btw. the same thing happens with -O2 so it compiles even with
> higher optimizations but don't know if that counts.
> bad: 100 tests seem to fail. 3 aborted due to SIGILL and
> the rest (97) aborted with SIGSEGV. i don't know if there are in
> sum 100 tests or if there are more than that. i hope for the
> latter. haven't looked at the build log that closely.
> do you want the build log attached to this bug report? because
> it's roughly 418kB large. or should i put it at some location?
> maybe people.d.o or some such, so that it is kept longer. the
> latter isn't a good solution and the first isn't also that nice.
> so what do you want?
> meanwhile you can get it from
> for the maintainer: i added you to the list because it affects
> your package and at least some progress is made, maybe you can
> say something about these tests.
> so long
Camm Maguire email@example.com
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com