also sprach Alexander Reelsen <alr@emplify.de> [2006.03.10.1614 +0100]: > Loosely following netfilter-devel, I think this is not necessary. > The ipt_recent problems are known and being worked on. Mh, I didn't find anything during a quick look and since I like to answer my own questions on all mailing lists where I posted them, well... it's for history. > > Perhaps you could ask them why the module is still being distributed > > within the kernel tree, when submitted patches are rejected by the > > maintainers because "it needs a complete rewrite"? > > Patches which don't change any of the functionality (or proc file > system entries) are currently rejected wait, what? Has the netfilter team turned the stable concept around? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "vulgarity is simply the conduct of other people." -- oscar wilde
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)