[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status update LT 2003 CD



On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> The bunk package looks a little bit better
> sven@marvin:/tmp$ dpkg -I openoffice.org-bin_1.0.3-1.bunk_i386.deb
>  Architecture: i386
>  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libfreetype6 (<< 2.1.0), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.2-0.bunk), libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.3-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.2-0.bunk), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0), xlibs (>> 4.1.0), openoffice.org (>= 1.0.2-pre1.0.3)
> 
> Hints and suggestions from the people who would like to have
> OOo included?

Bunk should be okay IMO. The last time I tried Adrian's packages were
doing well.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!



Reply to: