[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: esperanto locale kaj glibc



Agustin Martin Domingo <agmartin@aq.upm.es>:

> I do not see this message archived at debian-esperanto. I think I send 
> it, but I am resending it just in case something was wrong.

Mi ne jam vidis vian mesaĝon.

> My (blind) guess was that it can be fixed just adding eo_EO to the list
> of supported locales in the locales-supported.dpatch file. Seems that
> __SUPPORTED_LOCALES__ value is written to locales.config at some time of
> the glibc build process by debian/locales.mk (and is not any internal
> glibc variable as I thought before), so that will result in a full and
> recent locales list to be written to the locales.config file.
> 
> I think a simple wishlist bug "Please add esperanto locale to the list
> of supported locales" does suffice for that. Do I file it?

Jes, bonvolu fari. Tamen, estu ne nur

eo_EO ISO-8859-3

sed ankaŭ:

eo_EO.UTF-8 UTF-8

Aŭ kun XX; vidu sube.

> Some time ago I was googling a bit about that, and I vaguely remember
> that some people even proposed a plain "eo" for that, (I do not know if
> that will activate LC_CTYPE and LC_COLLATE or a country definition is
> needed for that). If a plain "eo" is not possible or desirable, I also
> find eo_XX better than eo_EO, but I would not change this until glibc
> upstream has made a choice.

Mi suspektas, ke la glibc-uloj faros nenion baldaŭ, do indas rigardi,
kion faras la xfree86-uloj.

> My knowledge about glibc is small, but I guess adding esperanto to the
> locales alias file in any of both forms, and another alias as the other
> might suffice. Something like
> 
> esperanto eo_EO.ISO-8859-3
> eo_XX     eo_EO.ISO-8859-3

Tion mi ne celis. Mi celis akcepti kaj "eo_EO" kaj "eo_XX" kiel
ekvivalentojn. Tio estus utila dum la nuna konfuzo pri tio.

Edmundo



Reply to: