Re: Creating debs using a cross-build envronment?
+++ Neil Williams [2012-02-23 13:42 +0000]:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:16:42 +0100
> Svante Signell <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 13:03 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > You don't need cross-build tools for that. Your doing a native build,
> > > so just use the normal Debian packaging tools (dpkg-buildpackage) and
> > > build for hurd-i386.
> > I'm doing that natively for most packages already. Some packages are
> > problematic though, so maybe a cross-build can be of use.
> How? When a package will not build natively, it won't cross build
I don't think that's necessarily true - it depends on the details
(implementation language, significance of architecture differences in
> > > > b) And to enable support for gnat in GNU/Hurd, either as a deb or
> > > > binaries created by the cross-build environment and copied to the target
> > > > for native .deb builds there.
> > >
> > > Forget about linux-i386/hurd-i386 cross-building and just change the
> > > package in such a way that it can build a minimal .deb which provides
> > > enough functionality without the complicating dependencies, such that
> > > you can then build the next stage. Cross-building is not the answer
> > > here and even if you are convinced it is, Emdebian cannot provide the
> > > toolchains to do it.
> > I think cross-building is the _only_ answer here since gnat needs gnat,
> > see my previous mail.
> No, we've been here before in Emdebian. When foo needs foo, foo needs
> to be modified to build mini-foo which doesn't need extra stuff, and
> provides just enough functionality to allow mini-foo to be installed
> (natively) and then support the building of another foo before you maybe
> go on and build the full foo.
THis only works if mini-foo is in a language you already have a
compiler for. So it works for perl, which has a core written in C. It
doesn't work for mono, which has its core written in mono, for
> perl does this, compilers do this. The issue with cross-building is
> that you cannot run the binaries compiled as cross binaries on the
> system which is doing the build. So the best solution here is to build
> natively, building only a small subset of the functionality.
You can't build a language natively if you haven't yet bootstrapped
that language on the target architecture. Sometimes
cross-bootstrapping is the only way to get started. (if the version of
tha language built on another architecure (the BUILD arch) is
sufficiently compatible to be used to compile/intepret the language on
the HOST arch. Usually it is because there has to be _some_ way of
bootstrapping the language.
Several languages have this property: haskell, mono, and I think java
I know nothing about ada, which is the question here. But so far as I
can tell it doesn't have a core C implmentation so you have to have an
ada compiler in order to build it. A cross-gnat compiler seems like
the only general way to get such a thing, (on x86 linux->hurd it may
be possible to bodge something with the existing i386-linux-gnu ada
compiler, assuming there is some mechanism for running linux binaries
on the hurd?)
> Identifying the subset is the hard part.
> Even if you do a cross-build, you're still going to need to build this
> mini-foo subset natively in order to execute it during the cross-build
> of the rest of the package.
No. other way round. You may have to cross-build mini-foo in order to
be able to natively build either foo or more probably mini-foo
Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM