On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:23:42 +0100 Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> wrote: > > Probably stick to the standard message: maybe failed | maybe successful. > > I think, I need more input... > > I need someone which build some Example <item> how it it should look and > what it should display and then I do the rest... OK. For Crush: <item> <title>base-files 4.0.6em1</title> <link>http://www.emdebian.org/buildd/history.php?pkg=base-files&arch=arm</link> <description> <p>base-files (4.0.6em1) probably <b>built successfully</b> for architecture arm on Fri 5th Dec, 05:33:35 UTC.</p> <p><a href="http://buildd.emdebian.org/svn/browser/current/target/trunk/b/base-files/trunk/";>Patch set</a>.</p> <p><a href="http://www.emdebian.org/packages/search.php?package=base-files&arch=arm";>Details of base-files</a> (4.0.6em1) in Emdebian Crush.</p> <p>Maintainer: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org></p> </description> <pubDateUnix>1225949618</pubDateUnix> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:33:38 +0100</pubDate> </item> for a failed build: <item> <title>apt 0.7.20.1em1 - maybe failed</title> <link>http://www.emdebian.org/buildd/history.php?pkg=apt&arch=arm</link> <description> <p>apt (0.7.20.1em1) probably <b>failed to build</b> for architecture arm on Sun 1st Feb, 05:33:51 UTC.</p> <p>Build log message: <b>Recording that the package failed to build</b>.</p> <p><a href="http://www.emdebian.org/buildd/?log=apt-arm-1233466431.log&pkg=apt#end";>Failure log</a></p> <p><a href="http://buildd.emdebian.org/svn/browser/current/target/trunk/a/apt/trunk/";>Patch set</a></p> <p>Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org></p> </description> <pubDateUnix>1225949618</pubDateUnix> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:33:38 +0100</pubDate> </item> Other messages would include "Patches failed to apply" or "Dependency failure" or "lintian failure". > Weird, since if I look into the source of > > <http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/rss.php?action=rss&what=crush&package=apt> > > with Iceape and: > > <chrome://navigator/content/viewSource.xul?url=http%3A//devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/rss.php%3Faction%3Drss%26what%3Dcrush%26package%3Dapt> I think iceape is adding that content. The feedvalidator site is the main test of the actual source. > Since I had some problems, I asked upstream of "rss2mail" for help and > he told me the RSS feed is OK but there are many RSS standards... > > Can it be, that "liferea" expect > > Content-Type: application/rss+xml; charset=utf8 > > while I am sending > > Content-Type: text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1 Not sure. > which should work for ANY RSS reader? The first one can not be read > withing Iceape and I have to save it do disk. Even with a Iceape plugin > > OK, "liferea" ist installed... and it just works by using the Link > > <http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/rss.php?action=rss&what=crush> > > Hey, it is realy nice... However, 46 MByte for such program is heavy... > > in "liferea" which I have done for some seconds... > (I have attached a screenshoot) I think the attachment got scrubbed by the mailing list - feel free to send the screenshot to me directly. I'm sending you a screenshot of current liferea - sent off-list. > Maybe there is a bug in your version? (My workstation is Etch) I'm using unstable. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
Attachment:
pgpkpAFw3mAJp.pgp
Description: PGP signature