Re: Bug#329114: Please don't shadow emacs-snapshot packages
Romain Francoise <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I don't know, Rob appears to be active but the package has certainly
> seen less attention than it deserves.
It should be about to see substantially more.
I'd like to figure out what needs fixing and fix it, but I want to be
careful because some of the emacsen-common stuff is trickier than I
often think at first glance.
> I wouldn't have a problem with that, it's your choice. Perhaps there is
> an alternate solution that we haven't thought of yet...
Let me read this thread more carefully and try to understand the issue
clearly, and I'll see if I have any suggestions.
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4