Hey, this is what we need!
--- Begin Message ---
- To: wmperry@aventail.com
- Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
- Subject: Re: Modules (was: Re: How about a feature freeze)
- From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
- Date: 21 Dec 1999 23:39:03 +0100
- Message-id: <byaen33omw.fsf@urysohn.math.ethz.ch>
- References: <71DE5436FE60D311B8F60050043207B544B064@leo.in.aventail.com> <9t9vh60gxit.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> <o977lif5nye.fsf_-_@lsppc4.epfl.ch> <9t9n1rbb3x6.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> <385C9BE8.12D352DE@666.com> <byk8mbdywd.fsf@bolzano.math.ethz.ch> <385CBF04.267323 <199912212027.PAA12748@megalith.bp.aventail.com>
wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) writes: > to their computer. They don't care that it is emacs underneath, or linux > underneath that, they just know they can use their computer and have > everything speech enabled magically. :) I think we should push Glynn Clements[1] to release his patches that make XEmacs have the right signal behavior for init and allows it to reap processes. innitab.el anyone? Jan Footnotes: [1] I think it was him.
--- End Message ---