Re: replacement for NFS ?
On 3/21/06, Alexander Schremmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:21:28 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Personally I favor OpenAFS due to its more MacOS (classic) like access
> > rules logic and support for flexible distributed storage pools. NFSv4
> > may be more interesting to SkoleLinux due to its better integration with
> > Windows.
> The Windows AFS clients (they should be even free) are just fine. A bit
> annoying sometimes (if you have "mounted" a network drive, they bug you
> until you have given them your credentials) but quite stable and usable.
> Kind regards,
I've been weighing up AFS and NFSv4 for a project just recently. NFSv4
is coming along really nicely (kerberos authentication works without
too much trouble, which would also work with LDAP).
AFS does work well functionally, but from my experiance was
*crawlingly* slow - I got at most 2MB/s over 100Mb lan.