Re: Some notes on the next generation LTSP (getting LTSP into Debian/main)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05-07-2005 11:44, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
>
>>It also need some adjustment for the kernel used on the clients, as
>>it uses unionfs and also need to handle NFS root file system.
>
>
> I asked on #debian-kernel about unionfs, and Christoph Hellwig claimed
> that "unionfs is broken and a mess", as it is "oopsable, wrong
> interface and the code is a total mess". He also said "we'll
> hopefully get working unionmounts upstream this year". He provided
> <URL:http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2005-July/> with
> background information on the problems with unionfs.
>
> So perhaps unionfs isn't the best option for the next generation LTSP?
Did I mention initrd-netboot-tools ?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCylrEn7DbMsAkQLgRAp9BAJ0aixw7jMFd0bSI5eQAWfe4wKUCDACgiKnd
Q51BmOqLyxUPS6uAR5b+WcU=
=A6Fc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: