Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Cc: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Subject: Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:23:49 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080225062349.GA1168@blae.erisian.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080224094844.GB3691@zulo.hadrons.org>
References: <[🔎] 20080211114819.GA24914@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20080211121556.GX18497@mail-vs.djpig.de> <[🔎] 20080211134633.GA9340@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20080224094844.GB3691@zulo.hadrons.org>

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:48:44AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So I don't quite like Joey's idea in its
> current form, for the reasons other people have stated on the thread:

*sigh* So dpkg isn't going to support it then?

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance)
Next by Date: Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??
Previous by thread: Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
Next by thread: Re: dpkg-source's future and relation with VCS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread