Anthony Towns wrote: > > 1) I don't really like the current behaviour when there are uncommitted > > changes in the package directory. I would suggest as default behaviour > > creating a commit containing these changes. This would eliminate the > > need for people having to commit changes if they don't really care. > > The most elegant solution would probably to create the commit, clone it > > and then do a "git reset HEAD^" in the package directory. Don't know if > > that is robust enough, though. > > Maybe you could do a "git branch dpkg-build.$UUID", commit in the branch, > generate the .git.tgz, then drop the branch? Ah, now I understand what Frank was getting at. Only problem I see with a temp branch is the source package would be shipped using this funky branch name. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature