On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:13:41AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On the other hand one could argue that dpkg-buildpackage should > intentionally remain simple and that people are expected to write > their own wrappers or replacements if they need. I like this thought. On the other hand, something like integrating dpkg-sig(s) functionality might be a good thing to do. Julian