Re: dpkg and sqlite... ...?
* sean finney:
> as a plus, it would drastically reduce the amount of code in dpkg. the
> hundreds of lines of code dedicated toe
> scanning/reading/writing/parsing/representing the various *.list
> *.md5sums etc could be reduced to a small number of sql queries.
And other information could be presented as virtual tables (once
upstream has settled the API), which might lead to further code
> so, what's the general consensus on this? yea or nay?
My experience with SQLite 3 has been very pleasant, but I don't know
much about the dpkg codebase.