Bug#256589: marked as done ([DPKG-SCANPACKAGES] informational message looks like a warning)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:54:12 +0000
with message-id <1111154052.9006.104.camel@descent.netsplit.com>
and subject line Bug#256589: /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages: informational message looks like warning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 00:04:12 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Sun Jun 27 17:04:04 2004
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from ca1.symonds.net (symonds.net) [66.92.42.136]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bejcx-0000MY-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:04:03 -0700
Received: from (jidanni1) [218.187.82.215]
by symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BejWd-0001oV-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:57:33 -0700
Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Beecn-0008PQ-4F; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:43:33 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages: informational message looks like warning
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:43:32 +0800
Message-Id: <E1Beecn-0008PQ-4F@jidanni1>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.21
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages
This line
** Packages in archive but missing from override file: **
looks a little scary, though I don't know a better way to say it.
(I always use /dev/null for override file anyway.)
OK, no big deal, could never mind this wishlist.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256589-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 13:54:19 +0000
>From scott@netsplit.com Fri Mar 18 05:54:18 2005
Return-path: <scott@netsplit.com>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCHvd-00059L-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:54:18 -0800
Received: (qmail 4510 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 13:54:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO descent.netsplit.com) (scott@62.49.129.40)
by populous.netsplit.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 13:54:12 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#256589: /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages: informational message
looks like warning
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
To: 256589-done@bugs.debian.org, Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1Beecn-0008PQ-4F@jidanni1>
References: <E1Beecn-0008PQ-4F@jidanni1>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nSRfTa4pnwCy0zhz27sE"
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:54:12 +0000
Message-Id: <1111154052.9006.104.camel@descent.netsplit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0
Delivered-To: 256589-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-nSRfTa4pnwCy0zhz27sE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:43 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> This line
> ** Packages in archive but missing from override file: **
> looks a little scary, though I don't know a better way to say it.
> (I always use /dev/null for override file anyway.)
> OK, no big deal, could never mind this wishlist.
>=20
It's a section header, there are others with "--" and "++" around them
to indicate the kind of list that appears below it.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-nSRfTa4pnwCy0zhz27sE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCOt2DIexP3IStZ2wRAkSeAKCa3lZqq0pyLF4axdPSRIAj5eFJRgCgoMYn
tn4ksvIdlvncaXR/t00LZdE=
=2x9u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-nSRfTa4pnwCy0zhz27sE--
Reply to: