Bug#295752: marked as done ([DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] replace "Maintainer" with "Changed by")
Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:08:41 +0000
with message-id <1111151321.9006.94.camel@descent.netsplit.com>
and subject line Bug#295752: [DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] should be "Changer by", but not "Maintainer"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2005 21:28:59 +0000
>From madduck@cirrus.madduck.net Thu Feb 17 13:28:59 2005
Return-path: <madduck@cirrus.madduck.net>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1tCl-0001Yr-00; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:28:59 -0800
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8F586B520
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:28:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cirrus.madduck.net (cirrus.madduck.net [130.60.75.59])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D346A8AB67E
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:28:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cirrus.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3921325DB83; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:28:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:28:58 +0100
From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: [DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] should be "Changer by", but not "Maintainer"
Message-ID: <20050217212858.GA17559@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.10-1-k7 i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.26
Severity: minor
dpkg-parsechangelog parses the developer's name and email as
"Maintainer". It may well be an Uploader or a Non-maintainer making
the change. Thus, I suggest using a different label, such as
"Changed by".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and =
bina
ii cpio 2.5-1.2 GNU cpio -- a program to manag=
e ar
ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the "make" =
util
ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an origin=
al
ii perl [perl5] 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion=20
ii perl-modules 5.8.4-6 Core Perl modules
-- no debconf information
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCFQyaIgvIgzMMSnURAreOAJwMh17aT8ImW9vap1t7420sBF5u4ACgql4P
ZZsQinIPu9rJwccmFgiqwUw=
=RsiB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295752-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 13:08:44 +0000
>From scott@netsplit.com Fri Mar 18 05:08:44 2005
Return-path: <scott@netsplit.com>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCHDX-0007sE-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 05:08:43 -0800
Received: (qmail 2940 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 13:08:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO descent.netsplit.com) (scott@62.49.129.40)
by populous.netsplit.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 13:08:41 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#295752: [DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] should be "Changer by", but
not "Maintainer"
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
To: 295752-done@bugs.debian.org, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050217212858.GA17559@cirrus.madduck.net>
References: <20050217212858.GA17559@cirrus.madduck.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9TNwPaGHxxckQE6/FQ7g"
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:08:41 +0000
Message-Id: <1111151321.9006.94.camel@descent.netsplit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0
Delivered-To: 295752-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-9TNwPaGHxxckQE6/FQ7g
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 22:28 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> dpkg-parsechangelog parses the developer's name and email as
> "Maintainer". It may well be an Uploader or a Non-maintainer making
> the change. Thus, I suggest using a different label, such as
> "Changed by".
>=20
Sadly this would appear to be "hysterical raisins". Too much relies on
these field names and values to change them now.
If you like, think of it as the "Maintainer according to the changelog
entry parsed".
The correct values are placed in the correct fields in the files that
matter.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-9TNwPaGHxxckQE6/FQ7g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCOtLZIexP3IStZ2wRAqe8AJ4xV7FKGbwFay1Lb5Dv8MVSm2/MjQCeK9zp
5g5qlpJQd/7NxBf81g4v/tI=
=wH1j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-9TNwPaGHxxckQE6/FQ7g--
Reply to: