On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 21:11 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > The LSB 2.0 uses 'ppc64' as the name of the architecture. The LSB 2.0 says: > > "Package Architecture Considerations > > All packages must specify an architecture of ppc64. [...]" > Please file this request with the powerpc64 port team, rather than with the dpkg maintainer. Support for this architecture will not be included until the port team have picked a name for it. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part