Re: Use of pseudo-tags to mark translation issues
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Philippe Faes wrote:
> I can see that is is useful for us to cathegorise bugs, and to be able
> to find i18n bugs automatically. However, the BTS already has a system
> of tags AND priorities.
> Why aren't the existing tags system expanded to include the pseudo-tags
> that Adam suggests? (eg. doc,arch,intl,assert,...) I don't see a good
> reason to have tags AND pseudo-tags. They serve the same purpose don't
Because the number of tags would get unwieldy. And the bts doesn't have
priorities, it has severities, which are different. And even if it did have
priorities, they wouldn't be enough to classify a bug.