Re: glibc recompiling was Re: libc resolver problem solved (critical bug)
Ben Gertzfield <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <email@example.com> writes:
>>>>> "Dale" == Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Dale> As another approach, does "==2.0.7u" cover all the -x
Dale> releases, or must they be stated explicitly?
Ben> Conflicts: libc6 (= 2.0.7u) will cover all the -x releases.
No, actually, I'm on crack. I don't know why I thought this. I think I
tried to use it once, but now I can't find it in the Packaging Manual.
I've had to use something like `Depends: gcc (>= 2.8.1-1), gcc (<=
2.8.1-100) to simulate this effect before.
Of course, if there's a more elegant way to do this, I'm all for it.