Re: Porting dpkg to UltraSPARC
On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote:
> "Dale" == Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Dale> 4 Is there some kind of requirements documentation that I could
> Dale> read that would help here? This seems a lot more pain to build
> Dale> than should be expected under these circumstances.
> If its any consolation, much the same thing had to be done to get it
> working on regular SPARC, a year ago. But at least all the
> development tools were pure Debian, so it was doable.
Do you still have access to that machine? Building a staticly linked dpkg
would allow us to Debianize xia01 and start building packages.
> The problem has always been that the dpkg tarball is maintainer-clean
> instead of merely distclean. The new code in CVS doesn't do this, but
> so far there's been no effort to switch to it, or to backport its
> innovations to the working dpkg.
Can we get access to the CVS archives? This would give us better tracking
of a "critical" component.
> Perhaps you could run the build on intel up until just before it
> actually calls ./configure, tarball that and then continue on the
This sounds worthy of an attemt. At least then I would be dealing with a
different set of dependencies. ;-)
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: email@example.com Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com