Bug#494332: developers-reference: mention explicitely that ITPs must be Cced to -devel@, and why.
Mentioned on -devel@:
On 30/07/08 at 15:10 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:33:39AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Giuseppe Iuculano <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Guus Sliepen ha scritto:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Description : arp handler inspection
> > > >
> > > > That is not a short description, that is just the expansion of the
> > > > acronym.
> > >
> > > Yes, this won't to be package synopsis.
> > Then you've submitted the ITP report incorrectly. That field should be
> > the intended 'Description' field of the package.
> Where's that written? I don't mean to be objectionable, but no such
> requirement is listed in the developer's reference:
> I think it's more important to submit an ITP early to avoid duplicate
> work than to spend more time perfecting the package description.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |